Consequences of the Sylow Theorems

نویسندگان

  • KEITH CONRAD
  • Geoff Robinson
چکیده

Proof. Any element of odd order in a symmetric group is an even permutation, so the 3-Sylow and 5-Sylow subgroups of S5 lie in A5. Therefore it suffices to focus on A5. Since |A5| = 60 = 22 · 3 · 5, the 3-Sylow subgroups have size 3 and the 5-Sylows have size 5. Call the numbers n3 and n5. By Sylow III, n3 | 20 and n3 ≡ 1 mod 3, so n3 = 1, 4, or 10. The number of 3-cycles (abc) in A5 is 20, and these come in inverse pairs, giving us 10 subgroups of size 3. So n3 = 10. Turning to the 5-Sylows, n5 | 12 and n5 ≡ 1 mod 5, so n5 is 1 or 6. Since A5 has at least two subgroups of size 5 (the subgroups generated by (12345) and by (21345) are different), n5 > 1 and therefore n5 = 6. Theorem 2.2. In Aff(Z/(5)), n2 = 5 and n5 = 1.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Group Actions, p-Groups, and the Sylow Theorems

In this note we introduce the notion of a group action on a set and use it to prove a number of theorems about p-groups and the Sylow theorems. For undefined terms see any decent book on group theory. The theory of p-groups and the Sylow theorems have a number of applications in Galoistheory. The nice structure of p-groups will translate via the fundamental theorem of Galois theory to nice stru...

متن کامل

Secondary Sylow Theorems

These theories extend the existent proof of the first sylow theorem (written by Florian Kammueller and L. C. Paulson) by what is often called the second, third and fourth sylow theorem. These theorems state propositions about the number of Sylow p-subgroups of a group and the fact that they are conjugate to each other. The proofs make use of an implementation of group actions and their properties.

متن کامل

Algebra Prelim Fall 2013

First we will prove a small lemma. Lemma 1. Let P be a p-Sylow subgroup of G. Let N be a normal subgroup of G such that P ⊂ N . Then all p-Sylow subgroups are in N . Proof. Let P̃ be a p-Sylow subgroup that is not P . Then by the Sylow Theorems, we know that gPg−1 = P̃ for some g ∈ G. Since P ⊂ N , and N is normal, we know that gPg−1 ⊂ N and hence P̃ ⊂ N . Thus all p-Sylow subgroups are in N . Now...

متن کامل

The Sylow theorems

Lagrange’s theorem tells us that if G is a finite group and H ≤ G, then #(H) divides #(G). As we have seen, the converse to Lagrange’s theorem is false in general: if G is a finite group of order n and d divides n, then there need not exist a subgroup of G whose order is d. The Sylow theorems say that such a subgroup exists in one special but very important case: when d is the largest power of ...

متن کامل

Formalising Sylow's theorems in Coq

This report presents a formalisation of Sylow’s theorems done in Coq. The formalisation has been done in a couple of weeks on top of Georges Gonthier’s ssreflect [2]. There were two ideas behind formalising Sylow’s theorems. The first one was to get familiar with Georges way of doing proofs. The second one was to contribute to the collective effort to formalise a large subset of group theory in...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008